Protection Against Irregular Notifications

Fernández Zubia Law Firm

Area: Tax Law
Case Type: Indirect amparo vs. desk audit order

Background

Estela Bayardo Osorio - In indirect amparo proceeding No. 513/2024, the desk audit order No. GIF6200002, contained in official letter No. 500-18-00-06-002024-1465 dated January 26, 2024, as well as its notice, was challenged.

Legal Strategy

The illegality of the notice was argued because it was served on a third party without the tax authority confirming that it was at the correct address.

Result Obtained

AMPARO GRANTED: The District Judge determined that the notice was served in a manner contrary to law and granted the amparo so that the notice would be set aside and all subsequent proceedings would have no effect. The review appeal is pending before the Collegiate Court of the Thirty-Second Circuit (docket 652/2024).

Visit Our Blog

Complaint before the SFP: When It Is Applicable and What to Expect from the Process

When a company discovers that a public official demanded an improper payment to award them a contract, that the bidding terms of a tender were tailored to a competitor, or that an official systematically favors certain suppliers to the detriment of others who better meet the requirements.

Complaint before the SFP: When It Is Applicable and What to Expect from the Process

When a company discovers that a public official demanded an improper payment to award them a contract, that the bidding terms of a tender were tailored to a competitor, or that an official systematically favors certain suppliers to the detriment of others who better meet the requirements.

National Anticorruption System: How It Works and What It Implies for Private Companies

There is a widespread perception among directors and legal representatives of Mexican companies that deserves to be directly challenged: believing that the National Anticorruption System (SNA) is a matter that only concerns public servants.

National Anticorruption System: How It Works and What It Implies for Private Companies

There is a widespread perception among directors and legal representatives of Mexican companies that deserves to be directly challenged: believing that the National Anticorruption System (SNA) is a matter that only concerns public servants.

5 mistakes companies make when facing a closure or sanction without legal counsel

Closure is a penalty imposed by the administrative authority for a specific failure to comply, the purpose of which is to prevent the operation of the commercial establishment either partially or totally...

5 mistakes companies make when facing a closure or sanction without legal counsel

Closure is a penalty imposed by the administrative authority for a specific failure to comply, the purpose of which is to prevent the operation of the commercial establishment either partially or totally...

If you are looking for a reliable, efficient law firm with the capacity to protect your interests, contact us today to schedule a consultation!

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

When is it advisable to initiate litigation against a state or federal authority?
How does an administrative lawsuit work in Mexico?
What types of companies need regulatory legal counsel?
What to do if the SAT freezes your company's bank accounts?
How to determine if a bidding process was unfair or contestable?
When is it advisable to initiate litigation against a state or federal authority?
How does an administrative lawsuit work in Mexico?
What types of companies need regulatory legal counsel?
What to do if the SAT freezes your company's bank accounts?
How to determine if a bidding process was unfair or contestable?
When is it advisable to initiate litigation against a state or federal authority?
How does an administrative lawsuit work in Mexico?
What types of companies need regulatory legal counsel?
What to do if the SAT freezes your company's bank accounts?
How to determine if a bidding process was unfair or contestable?